The original article briefly touches on custody risks but doesn't delve into the specifics. A follow-up article could explore the different types of custodians used for asset-backed stablecoins, their security measures (insurance, auditing, vault technology), and the potential vulnerabilities they face. This would involve analyzing past incidents involving compromised custodians and examining the regulatory frameworks surrounding custodial practices for tokenized assets. The article could also provide a checklist or framework for investors to assess the credibility and reliability of the custodian backing their chosen stablecoin. Furthermore, a comparative analysis of different custodian models, such as centralized vs. decentralized custody solutions, can be included. A crucial aspect would be to detail the process for verifying the existence and security of the underlying assets held by the custodian, offering insights into the audit processes and reporting mechanism