Introduction
In C#, strings are one of the most used data types.
Whenever you work with user input, logs, messages, or database queries, you deal with string manipulation.
However, using the normal string class can become inefficient if you modify text multiple times (for example, concatenating in a loop).
That’s where StringBuilder comes to the rescue — it’s optimized for frequent string changes.
In this article, we’ll explore both String and StringBuilder with real-time ASP.NET WebForms examples, and understand where each should be used.
1. What is a String in C#?
A string in C# is an immutable (unchangeable) sequence of characters.
When you modify a string — for example, by concatenating —
C# actually creates a new string object in memory every time.
Example
string name = "Sandhiya";
name += " Priya"; // Creates a new string in memory
C#
This means each modification costs extra memory and CPU time, which becomes inefficient inside loops.
2. What is StringBuilder in C#?
The StringBuilder class (from the System.Text namespace) is a mutable object — meaning it can change the same memory block without creating new string objects each time.
It’s ideal when:
You modify strings inside loops
You perform many concatenations
You generate large text dynamically (like HTML or reports)
3. Namespace Required
using System.Text;
C#
4. Real-Time Example: Compare String vs StringBuilder
Scenario
You are generating 1000 customer names (or messages) dynamically in an ASP.NET WebForm.
Let’s see how performance differs between string and StringBuilder.
ASPX Page (StringVsStringBuilder.aspx)
<%@ Page Language="C#" AutoEventWireup="true" CodeBehind="StringVsStringBuilder.aspx.cs" Inherits="WebFormsDemo.StringVsStringBuilder" %>
<!DOCTYPE html><html><head>
<title>Working with Strings and StringBuilder in C#</title></head><body>
<h2>String vs StringBuilder Example (ASP.NET WebForms)</h2>
<asp:Button ID="btnCompare" runat="server" Text="Compare Performance" OnClick="btnCompare_Click" />
<br /><br />
<asp:Label ID="lblResult" runat="server" ForeColor="Blue"></asp:Label></body></html>
HTML
Code Behind (StringVsStringBuilder.aspx.cs)
using System;using System.Diagnostics;using System.Text;
namespace WebFormsDemo{
public partial class StringVsStringBuilder : System.Web.UI.Page
{
protected void btnCompare_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
int count = 10000; // number of concatenations
Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch();
// Using normal string
sw.Start();
string str = "";
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++)
{
str += "Customer" + i + " ";
}
sw.Stop();
long stringTime = sw.ElapsedMilliseconds;
// Using StringBuilder
sw.Restart();
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++)
{
sb.Append("Customer").Append(i).Append(" ");
}
sw.Stop();
long sbTime = sw.ElapsedMilliseconds;
// Display result
lblResult.Text = $"<b>String Time:</b> {stringTime} ms<br/>" +
$"<b>StringBuilder Time:</b> {sbTime} ms<br/><br/>" +
$"StringBuilder is approximately <b>{stringTime / (double)sbTime:0.0}x faster</b>!";
}
}}
C#
Output Example
| Method | Time Taken (ms) | Performance |
|---|
| String | 480 ms | Slow (creates new objects repeatedly) |
| StringBuilder | 35 ms | Fast (reuses same memory) |
Result:
StringBuilder performs much better when performing many concatenations.
5. Real-Time Use Case: Generating Dynamic HTML
Imagine you’re building a Product Report Page in ASP.NET WebForms.
You want to display 50 products in an HTML table dynamically.
If you use string concatenation, it’s slow.
If you use StringBuilder, it’s much faster.
ASPX Page (DynamicHtmlExample.aspx)
<%@ Page Language="C#" AutoEventWireup="true" CodeBehind="DynamicHtmlExample.aspx.cs" Inherits="WebFormsDemo.DynamicHtmlExample" %>
<!DOCTYPE html><html><head>
<title>Dynamic HTML Using StringBuilder</title></head><body>
<h2>Product List Generated Using StringBuilder</h2>
<asp:Button ID="btnGenerate" runat="server" Text="Generate HTML" OnClick="btnGenerate_Click" />
<br /><br />
<asp:Literal ID="litHtml" runat="server"></asp:Literal></body></html>
HTML
Code Behind (DynamicHtmlExample.aspx.cs)
using System;using System.Text;
namespace WebFormsDemo{
public partial class DynamicHtmlExample : System.Web.UI.Page
{
protected void btnGenerate_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
// Create a dynamic HTML table using StringBuilder
StringBuilder html = new StringBuilder();
html.Append("<table border='1' cellpadding='5' cellspacing='0'>");
html.Append("<tr><th>Product ID</th><th>Product Name</th><th>Price</th></tr>");
for (int i = 1; i <= 10; i++)
{
html.Append("<tr>");
html.Append("<td>").Append(i).Append("</td>");
html.Append("<td>Product ").Append(i).Append("</td>");
html.Append("<td>₹").Append((i * 150).ToString()).Append("</td>");
html.Append("</tr>");
}
html.Append("</table>");
// Display in page
litHtml.Text = html.ToString();
}
}}
C#
Output (Displayed on Browser)
| Product ID | Product Name | Price |
|---|
| 1 | Product 1 | ₹150 |
| 2 | Product 2 | ₹300 |
| 3 | Product 3 | ₹450 |
| ... | ... | ... |
Result:
The table is dynamically generated using StringBuilder, efficiently and cleanly.
6. Key Differences: String vs StringBuilder
| Feature | string | StringBuilder |
|---|
| Mutability | Immutable | Mutable |
| Memory Usage | High (creates new object every time) | Low (same object reused) |
| Performance | Slow for large concatenations | Fast and efficient |
| Namespace | System | System.Text |
| Use Case | Small text operations | Repeated string modifications or dynamic content generation |
7. When to Use
| Scenario | Recommended Type |
|---|
| Small text or few concatenations | string |
| Large loops, repeated appending | StringBuilder |
| Dynamic HTML or SQL Query generation | StringBuilder |
| Fixed text, no modification | string |
8. Conclusion
Both String and StringBuilder are essential in C#,
but understanding when to use each one can greatly improve your web application’s performance and memory efficiency.
Use string for small, simple operations.
Use StringBuilder for loops, dynamic content, or performance-critical code.